To be clear: They didn’t just reject an update. They outright removed the app entirely. Otherwise my plan B would have been to remove the contacts permission which is used to display the name and profile picture locally if the XMPP address matches an entry in the users address book.
If Google Play accepted source code for their review process, then they could be a lot more accurate. Seems crazy that they don't even offer it as an option.
Has something been added by you, connected to the way contact lists work? Or has Google changed something so the same source code part does not pass their automated tests anymore?
They did they exact same thing to our messaging app at $work, for the exact same reason.
We know for a fact we don't upload the user's contacts anywhere (and the infra is self-hosted anyway, even if we did).
We couldn't get them to accept this fact and were only able to be reinstated by adding a note to our privacy policy about _why_ we upload them (we still don't actually upload any contacts).
Did you see this comment? Does that mean that it's possible to change the privacy policy or remove the permission? I do not know what you can do after an app is removed. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39369993
How is this possible? There are many apps that steal the contact list, and one that does NOT is removed for such case. That seems very intentional… Very sad
Štěpán Škorpil :skorpil_cz:
•Do you think this check is automatic? Or could it be stupid reviewer?
~n
•Râu Cao ⚡
•Ténno Seremélʹ
•Daniel Gultsch
•Fluchtkapsel
•🌈 Lascapi
•Markus :bayern: 🇩🇪 🇪🇺
•Ok, they just removed the first word.
saturated :libreoffice:
•Dave
•Sooo... they've been consequent and removed WhatsApp from the Play Store, too?
They're treating all apps the same, right?
Gwenn
•So we should install it within #fdroid !
https://f-droid.org/en/packages/eu.siacs.conversations/
#Conversations_im
Conversations | F-Droid - Free and Open Source Android App Repository
f-droid.orgFrost, Wolffucker 🐺:therian:
•Benjamin
•Arthur Schiwon 🌍
•Guus der Kinderen
•Mazhe
•Раджа
•Tuxicoman
•#whatsapp should be removed day one with such argument.
Who told private monopoly would solve bureaucracy ? Haha.
So sad for you ! Keep up !
Gary "grim" Kramlich
•thecoffemaker
•it's sad, but the sadest side of it is that they cut one of ways to fund your development efforts. Shame on them!
#googlesucks
Radasbona
•#conversations removed but whatsapp not.
So it should be clear, the contacts upload is a lie.
Maybe it is political pressure against self hosted chat services.
Hans-Christoph Steiner
•𝖆𝖒𝖆𝖗𝖔𝖐 🇨🇿🇪🇺
•Or has Google changed something so the same source code part does not pass their automated tests anymore?
Hamido
•They did they exact same thing to our messaging app at $work, for the exact same reason.
We know for a fact we don't upload the user's contacts anywhere (and the infra is self-hosted anyway, even if we did).
We couldn't get them to accept this fact and were only able to be reinstated by adding a note to our privacy policy about _why_ we upload them (we still don't actually upload any contacts).
Buntbart
•Lyyn ☮️🦄 #2024-02-16
•https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39369993
They did the same thing to our messaging app where I work. Claimed we were uploa... | Hacker News
news.ycombinator.comCyrille Pontvieux
•Methuselah
•:gnu: bonifartius 𒂼𒄄
•Element suspended on Google Play Store: now resolved.
Matthew Hodgson (Element Blog)Tomato :BlobhajHugFullBody:
•